Review Criteria
Papers should demonstrate scholarly quality as evaluated on the strength of the methodology used, the quality/depth of the theoretical foundation, and the quality/depth of the analysis and related discussion. In addition, these should maintain a high level of scholarly quality, reflecting on how this work extends/is distinguished from other work attempted in similar areas.
This set of review criteria will be applied for all papers:
Context
Effectiveness of relating this work in demonstrating a strong knowledge of related and prior work.
Significance
How this submission is important and makes an important contribution to accreditation or engineering education.
Relevance
How the work advances frontiers in education or accreditation within the context of ICACIT Symposium.
Scholarly Quality
How the submission demonstrates appropriate rigor and reflective depth when outlining the novel practice at their and other institutions.
Language and Expression
The organization, language and English expression used in the submission is appropriate and facilitate the understanding.
Papers should demonstrate scholarly quality as evaluated on the strength of the methodology used, the quality/depth of the theoretical foundation, and the quality/depth of the analysis and related discussion. In addition, these should maintain a high level of scholarly quality, reflecting on how this work extends/is distinguished from other work attempted in similar areas.